Play
Today, the claim remains true. The "undereducated" have become more familiar
with
personal computing, e-mail, the World Wide Web, and possibly hypertextual applications.
Other forms of electronic writing, like DJing, which pose great
potential for innovation in teaching, remain marginal in writing
instruction because they don't, at first glance, fit in the
framework of traditional composition demands. Such instruction
fears how new,
electronic rhetorical approaches,
like sampling, will
ignore the basic tenets of
composition pedagogy: development
of claims (or topic sentences), supports,
organization, voice, audience, mechanics, and style. Yet, what I perform here
briefly challenges such assumptions. When mixed down into a composition,
we see that the temporal juxtapositions I forge reveal an emerging argument
regarding style and content. In my mix, the two writing issues are
not distinct, but
rather interlocking. Style, as
Lanham and Irmscher demonstrate, is important to writing.
But style, as Hebdige and Barthes show, directs content.
In turn, Citizen Kane provides a model for a writing style
conducive to electronic writing: the collection.
Here, then, are both my claims and my supports,
which
stem from my juxtapositions
(within the main text and the sampled mouseovers).
My organization is motivated by the mix, as is my authorial voice
(whose ethos is
established through the research I've done to form this mix).
I haven't ignored
composition's
previous needs. I've only updated them to reflect
technological demands.
My argument, then, my emerging critique of composition studies
briefly explored
in this performance, is the mix.